Exploring Fear in Howl, Basketball Diaries, and Cats Cradle

yacketayakking screaming vomiting whispering facts and memories and anecdotes and eyeball kicks and shocks of hospitals and jails and wars (Ginsberg 11). Like many authors of the modern literature movement, Allen Ginsberg explores the bombs psychological affects on many Americans during the 1960s. Modern literature describes the chaos of the 1960s, caused by increasing societal problems and fear of the new atomic bomb. Writings such as The Basketball Diaries, Howl and Cats Cradle express concepts of fear, power, governmental control, and death. Government uses societys fear of death and the end of the world to keep control and power over the people. The atomic bomb generates such universal fear and the corrupted government fails†¦show more content†¦Dr. Hoenikker is oblivious to the consequences of his actions and inventions. He thinks of life as a game: Why should I bother with made-up games when there are so many real ones going on? (Vonnegut 17). He doesnt understand the seriousness of the products of his power. Felix illustrates, on an individual level, the type of corruption in government that Carroll and Ginsberg describe in The Basketball Diaries and Howl. The government not only lacks an understanding of the people, but seems not to care. The governments control of the world, like Dr. Hoenikkers, includes the tremendous power to end existence. The governments power is playing games with society when considering the use of the nuclear bomb. The government causes the people of the world to live in fear, waiting for the bomb to drop. This power that Dr. Hoenikker and the government hold could be used in a much more constructive way, to help society instead of destroying it. An image in Cats Cradle that proves how fear is used to control a population, is that of the hook in San Lorenzo. The hook, and fear of it, parallels the bombs significance according to Carroll and Vonnegut. The hook is supposedly used in San Lorenzo to execute anyone who practices the illegal faith, Bokononism. Though everyone in San Lorenzo practices this faith, and the hook hasnt been used in many years, the fear that is stimulated by the hook

Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury Essay - 569 Words

Enjoy: Fahrenheit 451 is a book for a variety of people. The main age of when this book should be read is when a person is above the age of 14 years old. This book is recommended for ages 14 and up because of the content in which the story is told. Also the compression of this book is in depth and important to the making of our future. Ray Bradbury uses strong words that help build up the story. This book is a dystopian book written in the 1950’s and having the book takes place in the 21st century. A recommended for this book is to people who are interested in dystopian novels. Also that the reader can relate the story to real life situation, for some things in the book did come true. Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 is recommended for†¦show more content†¦I like science-fiction and dystopian novels because it allows me understand different views of how the world will be in the future. This dystopian novel allows me to help the future to become a place that is go od and allows me to change the future and protect it into becoming a society in which is dystopian or a utopian novel. I also like the foreshadowing of the book and events that happened in real life. This book was written in the 1950’s and since it was a dystopian novel, it talked about the future. In this book, Bradbury talks about a seashell that people can listen to music with, which lead to the iPod that Steve Jobs created in 2001. Also, in this book an interactive TV was used that was the size of a wall. This interactive TV was foreshadowed and now with the technology advancements, having an interactive TV is now possible. Also in Fahrenheit 451, it said that there was a TV that was a size of a wall in a room. This huge TV that was foreshadowed is now used in sports arenas and other venues. Setting: This story takes place in the future in an unknown city. This book takes place in the future where there are no speed limits. Characters: - Guy Montag Guy Montag is a firefighter and he is the protagonist. He is on a quest to find his purpose in life through books. He is wakes up with a feeling of emptiness in knowledge. He goes out to find out more about books and what they have to offer in life. - MildredShow MoreRelatedFahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury719 Words   |  3 PagesThe flash point of paper, or the temperature at which paper will burst in flames, is 451 degrees Fahrenheit. In Fahrenheit 451, written by Ray Bradbury, the main character, Guy Montag, is a â€Å"fireman† in a futuristic society where he and his coworkers start fires, rather than put them out. Books are banned and burned, along with the owner of the book’s house and sometimes even the owner of the book, upon discovery. Technology has taken over in a sense that social interaction between the average personRead MoreFahrenheit 451 By Ray Bradbury1952 Words   |  8 Pagesis clearly displayed in the plight of Ray Bradbury’s novel about a dystopian American society, Fahrenheit 451, which contains many ideas and bits of content that some people believed should be censored. In fact, one of the reasons that this novel was censored for displaying the dangers of censorship, which is both extr emely ironic, and telling as to where this society is going. Thanks to several distributors and oversensitive parents and teachers, Fahrenheit 451 has been banned in many schools overRead MoreFahrenheit 451 By Ray Bradbury954 Words   |  4 Pages In Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, the author uses allegory (often misinterpreted by readers) to show the dangers of mass media consumption and the decline of reading traditional media. Many readers draw incorrect conclusions (lessons learned) from the book due to how generally the book applies its theme. Government censorship, though an important topic, is not the intended focus of the novel Fahrenheit 451. Finally, Bradbury’s original message of the book shows the beauty of traditional media andRead MoreFahrenheit 451 By Ray Bradbury1592 Words   |  7 PagesWhen writing the introduction to Fahrenheit 451, author Neil Gaiman stated that â€Å"ideas--written ideas--are special. They are the way we transmit our stories and our th oughts from one generation to the next. If we lose them, we lose our shared history†. Gaiman is absolutely correct; especially because what he is saying heavily applies to books. Books are a critical aspect in shaping humanity as a whole, they create and share a network of creative ideas, history, and overall entertainment; to loseRead MoreFahrenheit 451 By Ray Bradbury1661 Words   |  7 Pages1.) In the novel, Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, Montag’s view on life reverses. Two characters the influence the main character Guy Montag are the old lady whose house and books were burnt down and Mildred. The old lady was caught preserving books in her home. Firemen including Montag were ordered to burn the books. The old lady refused to leave her books, so she too was burned. She bravely gave an allusion as her last words, â€Å"Play the man,’ she said, ‘Master Ridley.’ Something, somethingRead MoreFahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury818 Words   |  4 PagesFAHRENHEIT 451 BY RAY BRADBURY Important People in Montag’s Life In Partical Fulfillment Of English 2 Ms Irina Abramov By Helen Hernandez November 9, 2012 â€Å"There are worse crimes than burning books. One of them is not reading them† -Ray Bradbury. In the past there were events that affected book writers. People will get together to burn books because they thought it was inappropriate or they were against their literature. Montag is a fireman in a futuristic society who would startRead MoreFahrenheit 451 By Ray Bradbury918 Words   |  4 Pagesâ€Å"Fahrenheit 451,† written by Ray Bradbury, is a futuristic, dystopian novel based upon a society secluded by technology and ignorance. In this future society, books are outlawed and firemen are presented with the task of burning books that are found in people’s homes. Montag, a fireman, finds himself intrigued with the books, and begins to take them home and read them. As the story progresses, Montag learns the truth behind why books are outlawed and flees his city to join the last remnants of age-oldRead MoreFahrenheit 451 By Ray Bradbury863 Words   |  4 PagesTh e novel, Fahrenheit 451 was written by Ray Bradbury and it took place in the dystopian future. Throughout each novel, we are able to see a major theme, which is censorship. In this essay, I will explain how this theme are explored in the story by using the literary devices. To begin with, in this novel, censorship is not given a straight description, but we can see how the author shows it through many literary elements, such as using the setting, tone and symbolisms even foreshadowing. This novelRead MoreFahrenheit 451 By Ray Bradbury943 Words   |  4 PagesIn the novel Fahrenheit 451, written in 1951 by Ray Bradbury. There are many similarities between the novel and contemporary society, including technology, family lifestyle and censorship. In Fahrenheit 451, Bradbury’s main focus was on technology, such as televisions. Televisions were a big deal back in 1950, individuals were thrilled to get their hands on the new device. When it comes to Mildred, Montag s wife in Fahrenheit 451 novel. Mildred was so obsessed with televisions. She had three differentRead MoreFahrenheit 451 By Ray Bradbury1592 Words   |  7 PagesWhen writing the introduction to Fahrenheit 451, author Neil Gaiman stated that â€Å"ideas--written ideas--are special. They are the way we transmit our stories and our thoughts from one generation to the next. If we lose them, we lose our shared history†. Gaiman is absolutely correct; especially because what he is saying heavily applies to books. Books are a critical aspect in shaping humanity as a whole, they create and share a network of creative ideas, history, and overall entertainment; to lose

“Should Fast Food Chains Be to Blame for Childhood Obesity” Free Essays

â€Å"Should fast food chains be to blame for childhood obesity? † As defined by dictionary. com obesity is the condition of being obese; increased body weight caused by excessive accumulation of fat. Obesity is determined by the level of BMI (body mass index). We will write a custom essay sample on â€Å"Should Fast Food Chains Be to Blame for Childhood Obesity† or any similar topic only for you Order Now According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, BMI is calculated from a child’s weight and height, and is compared to a chart that tells you what is along the normal ranges. As you can see, children do not just wake up one day and find themselves overweight, there has to be some kind of influence that is making them that way, whether it be the foods they eat at home, or what they eat while with friends. This is not a matter that should be taken lightly. Who should be blamed? Some people believe the parents are to blame because they should provide their children with healthier meal choices at all times. Others believe the influence fast food companies have through the media and advertising is too great and children would rather have a happy meal that comes with a toy than have a healthy cooked meal from home. The way of living has changed drastically from the 1970s to the present. Back in the 1970s mothers were more likely to be homemakers and had the time to dedicate to homemade meals three times a day. Nowadays, women are more likely to take part in careers and therefore live more hectic lifestyles. People are busier than ever and most of the time it is much easier to drive by a fast food restaurant and pick up dinner than to slave in the kitchen after a long day at work. â€Å"Fewer family meals are eaten together now (less than 5 a week of 21 meals) than in the years past† (King, 28). The fast food business has boomed in the recent years due to this and they tend to advertise mostly to kids using colorful advertisements with their favorite cartoon characters and reel them in by providing a toy along with a processed hamburger and greasy French fries. Being an obese child can have many effects on their health, both physical and emotional health are impacted greatly by being overweight. Some children are never taught proper ways to cope with their emotions and eating is what they turn to make them feel better when nothing else is going right. Obese children tend to suffer from low self-esteem and may develop eating disorders in their quest to become thin. â€Å"Obese adolescents are more prone to emotional and behavior problems and also more likely to develop psychopathologies during both adolescence and adulthood† (Willette, 565). Overweight children are at risk for more diseases than children within their normal weight. â€Å"Adult diseases, such as type 2 diabetes, are being diagnosed in 8-and 9-year-old children† (King, 28). Some parents rely on television and video games to keep their children entertained after a long day because they do not have time to take the children outside to play. †Health concerns such as undernutrition, lack of physical activity and increased incidence of chronic diseases are more common in low-income and minority youth† (King, 28). Everywhere we turn we are bombarded by advertisements for some type of fast food restaurant. Billboards, television commercials, radio ads, and print are just some of the media used to get the message to people to come out to their restaurants, and use catchy slogans with animated characters. It is no secret these ads are mostly advertising to children and teenagers. In 2002, it was estimated that annual sales of food and beverages to young consumers exceeded $27 billion. Advertisers have recognized that young consumers are a valuable market and have begun to advertise directly to them. Food and beverage advertisers collectively spend$10 billion to $20 billion annually to reach children and youth, and more than $1 billion of that is spent on direct media advertising to children (Willette, 565). Children are more likely to be influenced by these advertisements, especially when it involves something they think is cool. These advertisements are mostly found on channels such as nickelodeon or Disney channel. It is very hard because there is no way to avoid these advertisements unless you move yourself and your children to a cave. Parents have an important effect on their children’s development because they are the ones who raise their children from day one. If a child is raised eating healthy foods they are more likely to keep making those choices as they grow older and pass those habits on to their children. Bad eating habits can be passed on as well. Some parents simply don’t know how to make healthy eating choices themselves, and it affects them and their children around the waistline. Parents should lead by example; they should not only encourage their children to eat healthy, but also do the same themselves. So why are parents blaming fast food chains for their children obesity? Well, because no one wants to hold themselves responsible and it is always much easier to point the finger at someone else. No parent wants to be seen as the reason for making their child overweight and want some type of reassurance that their parenting efforts ave not all been ineffective. Parents also are the ones that pay for the fast food and provide it for their children, so it can’t fully be the fast food companies fault, right? Children are going to be children and they are going to always want what is not good for them, but the parents have some control over what they choose to feed their child, and it should be done even if it re quires them to spend more time in the home. In conclusion, the media is always going to have a big impact on the lives of everyone especially children. Childhood obesity is a health epidemic affecting many children in this country today. Parents are the ones who give guidance and should work hard to teach their children healthy eating habits. Fast food companies use advertising and many other things to attract children; but at the end of the day, companies need to make money. So the blame game parents are using needs to stop. Fast food is not going anywhere and the parents should be the ones being held responsible for their children not fast food companies who have no relation to these children. Works cited â€Å"Kaiser Family Foundation Releases Report on Role of Media In Childhood Obesity. † Pediatric Nursing 30. (2004): 165 Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 18 Apr. 2010. Willette, Amanda L. â€Å"Where Have All the Parents Gone? Do Efforts to Regulate Food Advertising To Curb Childhood Obesity Pass Constitutional Muster?. † Journal of Legal Medicine 28. 4 (2007): 561-577. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 18 Apr. 2010. King, Nancy, and Dayle Hayes. â€Å"Shame, Blame and the ‘War on Childhood Obesity’: Confronting the Real Problems, Identifying the Positive Solutions. † Healthy Weight Journal 17. 2 (2003): 28. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 18 Apr. 2010. How to cite â€Å"Should Fast Food Chains Be to Blame for Childhood Obesity†, Essays

King Vs.thoreau Essay Example For Students

King Vs.thoreau Essay King vs. Thoreau By acting civil but disobedient you are able to protest things you dontthink are fair, non-violently. Henry David Thoreau is one of the most importantliterary figures of the nineteenth century. Thoreaus essay Civil Disobedience,which was written as a speech, has been used by many great thinkers such asMartin Luther King Jr. and Mahatma Ghandi as a map to fight against injustice. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was a pastor that headed the Civil Rights movement. He was a gifted speaker and a powerful writer whose philosophy was non-violentbut direct action. Dr.Kings strategy was to have sit-ins, boycotts, and marches. Dr. Kings Letter from Birmingham Jail was based on the principles ofThoreaus Civil Disobedience. Both Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry DavidThoreau are exceptional persuasive writers. Even though both writers are writingon ways to be civil but disobedient, they have opposite ways of convicing you. Dr. King is religious, gentle and apologetic, focusing on whats good for the group;while Thoreau is very aggressive and assertive for his own personal hate againstthe government. Both Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry David Thoreau have the sameideas, but view them differently. Dr. King wants to ultimately raise awareness andopen doors for the better of a group. Thoreau wants more individual rights forpeople. Dr. King is explaining his view of conscience:I submit that an individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him isunjust, and willingly accepts the penalty by staying in jail to arouse theconscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing thevery highest respect for the law (Martin Luther King, p. 521). This quote shows Dr. Kings opinion on going to jail. King knows that he wasunjustly put into jail. He accepts going to jail even though he was put in jailwrongly. The community then knows of the injustice and should pressure thegovernment. The other thing that happens is King is respecting the law by obeyingit. He is a peaceful man and wants justice, but believes in following the rulespeacefully to get the job done. Thoreau feels that conscience plays a morepersonal role. Can there not be a government in which majorities do not virtually decideright and wrong, but conscience? Must the citizen ever for a moment, orin the least degree, resign his conscience to the legislator? Why has everyman a conscience, then. I think that we should be men first, and subjectafterward (Henry David Thoreau, p.581).Thoreau is questioning why majorities make the rules. He is questioningdemocracy. Hes telling us to question anything we do and why we should giveinto the government if we do not agree with a rule. Why should we be individualswith brains and have thoughts of our own if we are not allowed to think forourselves and do what we want? If we believe we are free, why do we have somany rules? Thoreau believes we should be real to ourselves and live forourselves, not the government. King wants to change the laws because they aremorally wrong and Thoreau wants to change the law because he personallydoesnt like it. Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King both agree injustice exists. Thoreau thinks of injustice as friction or tension that can wear the machine down. King thinks that injustice just exists and tension must be created with directaction to negotiate with the machine. Thoreau explians, If the injustice is part of the necessary friction of the machine of government, let it go, let it go: perchance it will wear smooth,-certainly that machine will wear out, but if it is of such a naturethat it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another , then, Isay, break the law. Let your life be a counter friction to stop themachine. (Henry David Thoreau, p.587).Injustice is a cause of friction, which is brought on by the government. The government has created something that is working against itself; if thefriction of the injustice is left alone it will continue to grind down the machine. Once again Thoreau questions if you can wait that long and what are youpersonally going to do about the injustice. Thoreau says use your life to stop themachine. Dr. King ex plains, injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality tied in a single garment ofdestiny. Whatever affects one directly affects all indirectly (King p.516). If weallow injustice to affect any one place the government knows they can get awaywith it. If people dont fight injustice the government will continue to allow itbecause they know they can get away with it. We are all tied together in a mutualdestiny; we are all in the same boat, what ever affects you affects me. How canyou sit and watch injustice happen, we are all connected; what injustice happensto me happens to you. Both Thoreau and King are trying to prove the point thatwe are our brothers keeper. We all need to fight injustice to save each other. .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce , .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce .postImageUrl , .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce , .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce:hover , .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce:visited , .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce:active { border:0!important; } .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce:active , .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Ancient mariner EssayThoreau and King have said what role conscience plays for them and thatinjustice exists but you must use your conscience to decide what to do. Now theydiscuss just and unjust laws. Thoreau explains,unjust laws exist: Shall we be content to obey them, or shall weendeavor to amend them, and obey them until we have succeeded, orshall we transgress them at once. ( Henry David Thoreau, p.586) Thoreau is acknowledging that unjust laws exist. I think he figured likethe sun rises every morning there will be unjust laws. How you deal with them ifyou do not approve of them is the question. Thoreau asks, will you be happy tojust obey the law for as long as it tak es to change the law by the governmentsrules?Do you want immediate acton? If you follow the governments rules it willtake a very long time to appeal the unjust law in court and they still may notchange the law. Can you wait that long?Or, should you take drastic direct actionto be heard at once. Are you willing to be arrested? Can you handle theresponsibility for your actions, or are you scared. Thoreau is impleying that youshould not wine about something inless you are ready and able to take theconciquinces. Dr. King explains how he justifies breaking some laws andfollowing others; the fact is there are simply two types of laws. Dr. King explainsthere are, just and unjust laws, One has not only a legal, but moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law ofGod. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of Saint Thomas Aguinas, and unjust law is ahuman law that is not rooted in eternal and natural law. Any law thatuplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades humanpersonality is unjust. ( Dr. King p.519-520).King is saying that just laws should be obeyed because they are the law and theyare morally right. Morally right is being or acting in accordance with establishedstandards of good behavior. So, if a law is legal and good you should fallow it. People should not follow unjust laws because they are wrong; you owe it toyourself morally. A just law is one that God would O.K; God is all loving, blindto any indifference and will forgive. The constitution says that all men are createdequeal; so therefore if the law is not the same to everyone, it is not a just law. Ifanyone is dehumanized it is an unjust law. Plain and simple, an unjust lawmakes you feel bad about who or what you are . A just law should make you feelequal and proud to be a human being. While Thoreau focuses on what you mightdo about a law, Dr. King focuses on what makes a law just or unjust. Thoreauknows there are unjust laws; I believe he thinks as long as laws exist there willalways be the possibility of being unjust laws. Thoreau says yes, unjust laws existbut what are you going to do, just sit there or fight. Dr. King is trying to get in tothe heads of his fellow clergyman that unjust laws are morally wrong. But theyboth want to get the point across that you must do something to change unjustlaws because they are wrong and can take your God given freedom away. Even though both writers are writing on ways to be civil but disobedient, they have oppositeways of convincing you. Their concepts are similar but their approaches are totally opposite. Dr. .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc , .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc .postImageUrl , .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc , .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc:hover , .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc:visited , .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc:active { border:0!important; } .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc:active , .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Forensic psychology EssayKings religious and moderate tone are totally different from Thoreaus intense hatred forauthority, mostly the government. They both want to point a finger at the government. Thoreaubelieves the best government is one which governs the least. Dr. King believes the principles ofgovernment are necessary to keep order, but need to live up to All men are created equal. Theunderlying meaning that I got from reading both essays was that you should follow your heartand your conscience against injustice and unjust laws, no matter what approach you choose totake. Works Cited:Letter from Birmingham Jail Dr. Martin Luther KingCivil Disobedience- by ThoreauPhilosophy